Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Brunello vs Rosso di Montalcino

Same estate, same grape, a third of the price. What is the difference?

The short answer

Brunello di Montalcino and Rosso di Montalcino are both made from Sangiovese, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Brunello di Montalcino has more earthy character; Rosso di Montalcino has more herbal / green character; Brunello di Montalcino has more spice.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Brunello di Montalcino

Choose Brunello di Montalcino if you want something earthier, spicier, more tannic and structured.

Choose

Rosso di Montalcino

Choose Rosso di Montalcino if you want something more herbal and green.

Worth knowing

Rosso is the younger, shorter-aged wine from the same producers and often the same vineyards — frequently made from the fruit that did not make the cut, or from younger vines. It is the way to drink Montalcino Sangiovese this year rather than in ten.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Brunello di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Brunello di Montalcinolow (1/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Brunello di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is spicier: medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Brunello di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is more tannic and structured: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Brunello di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Brunello di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is more savoury: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionBrunello di MontalcinoRosso di Montalcino
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, leather, dried herbs, tobacco, espressored cherry, plum, dried herbs, violet, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more