Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cabernet Franc vs Nero d’Avola

How Cabernet Franc and Nero d’Avola differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cabernet Franc has more herbal / green character; Cabernet Franc has more floral character; Nero d’Avola has more spice.

Choose

Cabernet Franc

Choose Cabernet Franc if you want something more herbal and green, more floral, earthier.

Choose

Nero d’Avola

Choose Nero d’Avola if you want something spicier, stronger and warmer, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Cabernet Franctypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Nero d’Avolalow (1/5)

Cabernet Franc is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nero d’Avolalow (1/5)

Cabernet Franc is more floral: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Cabernet Franclow (1/5)
Nero d’Avolatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Nero d’Avola is spicier: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nero d’Avolalow (1/5)

Cabernet Franc is earthier: medium against low.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nero d’Avolatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Nero d’Avola is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nero d’Avolatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Nero d’Avola is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionCabernet FrancNero d’Avola
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)medium (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursraspberry, red plum, graphite, bell pepper, violetblack cherry, plum, liquorice, tobacco, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more