Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

California Cabernet Sauvignon vs McLaren Vale Shiraz

How California Cabernet Sauvignon and McLaren Vale Shiraz differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: McLaren Vale Shiraz has more spice; California Cabernet Sauvignon has more sweetness; McLaren Vale Shiraz has more tannin.

Choose

California Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose California Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something sweeter, more oaky.

Choose

McLaren Vale Shiraz

Choose McLaren Vale Shiraz if you want something spicier, more tannic and structured, stronger and warmer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

California Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is spicier: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

California Cabernet Sauvignontypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
McLaren Vale Shirazlow (1/5)

California Cabernet Sauvignon is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

California Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

California Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

California Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

California Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

California Cabernet Sauvignon is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Acidity: Similar — both medium.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionCalifornia Cabernet SauvignonMcLaren Vale Shiraz
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, cassis, vanilla, mocha, plumblackberry, red plum, dark chocolate, sea salt, liquorice

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more