Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione vs Washington Cabernet Sauvignon

How Chianti Classico Gran Selezione and Washington Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more earthy character; Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more savoury character; Washington Cabernet Sauvignon has more spice.

Choose

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

Choose Chianti Classico Gran Selezione if you want something earthier, more savoury, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Washington Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something spicier, fuller and richer, fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is more savoury: high against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionChianti Classico Gran SelezioneWashington Cabernet Sauvignon
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, leather, tobacco, dried herbs, espressoblackcurrant, black cherry, cocoa, graphite, sage

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more