Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti Classico vs Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

How Chianti Classico and Montepulciano d’Abruzzo differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Chianti Classico and Montepulciano d’Abruzzo come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Chianti Classico has more herbal / green character; Chianti Classico has more acidity; Chianti Classico has more earthy character.

Choose

Chianti Classico

Choose Chianti Classico if you want something more herbal and green, fresher and more acidic, earthier.

Choose

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

Choose Montepulciano d’Abruzzo if you want something fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Chianti Classicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)

Chianti Classico is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chianti Classicotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Chianti Classicotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)

Chianti Classico is earthier: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Chianti Classicotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Chianti Classico is fresher: high against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Chianti Classicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Chianti Classicotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionChianti ClassicoMontepulciano d’Abruzzo
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, tomato leaf, dried oregano, leather, balsamicblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoa

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more