Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti Classico vs New Zealand Pinot Noir

How Chianti Classico and New Zealand Pinot Noir differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: New Zealand Pinot Noir has more fruit intensity; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more spice; Chianti Classico has more acidity.

Choose

Chianti Classico

Choose Chianti Classico if you want something fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured, more herbal and green.

Choose

New Zealand Pinot Noir

Choose New Zealand Pinot Noir if you want something fruitier, spicier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Chianti Classicotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is fruitier: high against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Chianti Classicolow (1/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chianti Classicotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Chianti Classico is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Chianti Classicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Chianti Classicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico is more herbal and green: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Chianti Classicotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Chianti Classico is fresher: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionChianti ClassicoNew Zealand Pinot Noir
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C14–16°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, tomato leaf, dried oregano, leather, balsamicdark cherry, plum, thyme, violet, clove

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more