Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti vs Chianti Classico

How Chianti and Chianti Classico differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Chianti and Chianti Classico are both made from Sangiovese, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Chianti Classico has more tannin; Chianti Classico has more body; Chianti Classico has more oak influence.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Chianti

Choose Chianti if you prefer its flavour profile — sour cherry, tomato leaf, dried herbs.

Choose

Chianti Classico

Choose Chianti Classico if you want something more tannic and structured, fuller and richer, more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Chiantitypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Chianti Classicotypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico is more herbal and green: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionChiantiChianti Classico
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, tomato leaf, dried herbs, red plum, leathersour cherry, tomato leaf, dried oregano, leather, balsamic

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more