Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon vs McLaren Vale Shiraz

How Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon and McLaren Vale Shiraz differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon has more herbal / green character; McLaren Vale Shiraz has more spice; Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon has more acidity.

Choose

Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

McLaren Vale Shiraz

Choose McLaren Vale Shiraz if you want something spicier, stronger and warmer, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Chilean Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
McLaren Vale Shirazlow (1/5)

Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Chilean Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chilean Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Chilean Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Chilean Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Chilean Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionChilean Cabernet SauvignonMcLaren Vale Shiraz
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavourscassis, black cherry, mint, eucalyptus, cedarblackberry, red plum, dark chocolate, sea salt, liquorice

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more