Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Etna Rosso vs Rosso di Montalcino

How Etna Rosso and Rosso di Montalcino differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Etna Rosso and Rosso di Montalcino come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Etna Rosso has more earthy character; Etna Rosso has more floral character; Rosso di Montalcino has more herbal / green character.

Choose

Etna Rosso

Choose Etna Rosso if you want something earthier, more floral.

Choose

Rosso di Montalcino

Choose Rosso di Montalcino if you want something more herbal and green, fuller and richer, fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Etna Rossotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)

Etna Rosso is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Etna Rossotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)

Etna Rosso is more floral: medium against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Etna Rossolow (1/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Etna Rossotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Etna Rossotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionEtna RossoRosso di Montalcino
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, dried orange peel, ash, wild herbs, smokered cherry, plum, dried herbs, violet, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more