Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Etna Rosso vs Valpolicella Ripasso

How Etna Rosso and Valpolicella Ripasso differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Etna Rosso and Valpolicella Ripasso come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Etna Rosso has more earthy character; Etna Rosso has more floral character; Valpolicella Ripasso has more spice.

Choose

Etna Rosso

Choose Etna Rosso if you want something earthier, more floral, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Valpolicella Ripasso

Choose Valpolicella Ripasso if you want something spicier, sweeter.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Etna Rossotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Valpolicella Ripassolow (1/5)

Etna Rosso is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Etna Rossotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Valpolicella Ripassolow (1/5)

Etna Rosso is more floral: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Etna Rossolow (1/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is spicier: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Etna Rossolow (1/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Etna Rossotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Etna Rosso is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Etna Rossotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Etna Rosso is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both low-medium.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionEtna RossoValpolicella Ripasso
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, dried orange peel, ash, wild herbs, smokesour cherry, dried fig, cinnamon, plum, bitter chocolate

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more