Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon vs Washington Cabernet Sauvignon

How Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon and Washington Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon and Washington Cabernet Sauvignon are both made from Cabernet Sauvignon, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon has more herbal / green character; Washington Cabernet Sauvignon has more spice; Washington Cabernet Sauvignon has more body.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green.

Choose

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Washington Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something spicier, fuller and richer, fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is spicier: medium against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionMargaret River Cabernet SauvignonWashington Cabernet Sauvignon
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavourscassis, black cherry, bay leaf, graphite, cedarblackcurrant, black cherry, cocoa, graphite, sage

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more