Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

McLaren Vale Shiraz vs Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon

How McLaren Vale Shiraz and Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon has more oak influence; Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon has more herbal / green character.

Choose

McLaren Vale Shiraz

Choose McLaren Vale Shiraz if you prefer its flavour profile — blackberry, red plum, dark chocolate.

Choose

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more oaky, more herbal and green.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

McLaren Vale Shirazlow (1/5)
Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignontypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: low-medium against low.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both high.
  • Body: Similar — both high.

Full side by side

DimensionMcLaren Vale ShirazNapa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, red plum, dark chocolate, sea salt, liquoricecassis, black cherry, cocoa, vanilla, cedar

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more