Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

McLaren Vale Shiraz vs Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends

How McLaren Vale Shiraz and Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends has more herbal / green character; McLaren Vale Shiraz has more spice; Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends has more earthy character.

Choose

McLaren Vale Shiraz

Choose McLaren Vale Shiraz if you want something spicier, stronger and warmer, fuller and richer.

Choose

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends

Choose Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends if you want something more herbal and green, earthier, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

McLaren Vale Shirazlow (1/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendslow (1/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is spicier: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

McLaren Vale Shirazlow (1/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends is earthier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionMcLaren Vale ShirazStellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, red plum, dark chocolate, sea salt, liquoriceblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, fynbos, graphite

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more