Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

McLaren Vale Shiraz vs Super Tuscan

How McLaren Vale Shiraz and Super Tuscan differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

McLaren Vale Shiraz and Super Tuscan are the same variety under two names, so the difference is about where it is grown, how it is made and what each name has come to signal — not about the grape. The main differences: Super Tuscan has more herbal / green character; Super Tuscan has more acidity; McLaren Vale Shiraz has more alcohol.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

McLaren Vale Shiraz

Choose McLaren Vale Shiraz if you want something stronger and warmer, fruitier, rounder and creamier in texture.

Choose

Super Tuscan

Choose Super Tuscan if you want something more herbal and green, fresher and more acidic, more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

McLaren Vale Shirazlow (1/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Super Tuscan is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Super Tuscan is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Super Tuscan is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is rounder and creamier in texture: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionMcLaren Vale ShirazSuper Tuscan
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, red plum, dark chocolate, sea salt, liquoriceblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, mint, vanilla

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more