Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

McLaren Vale Shiraz vs Washington Syrah

How McLaren Vale Shiraz and Washington Syrah differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

McLaren Vale Shiraz and Washington Syrah are the same variety under two names, so the difference is about where it is grown, how it is made and what each name has come to signal — not about the grape. The main differences: Washington Syrah has more earthy character; Washington Syrah has more floral character; Washington Syrah has more acidity.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

McLaren Vale Shiraz

Choose McLaren Vale Shiraz if you want something stronger and warmer, fuller and richer, fruitier.

Choose

Washington Syrah

Choose Washington Syrah if you want something earthier, more floral, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

McLaren Vale Shirazlow (1/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Washington Syrah is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

McLaren Vale Shirazlow (1/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Washington Syrah is more floral: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Washington Syrah is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionMcLaren Vale ShirazWashington Syrah
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, red plum, dark chocolate, sea salt, liquoriceblackberry, black pepper, olive, smoked meat, violet

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more