Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

McLaren Vale Shiraz vs Zinfandel

How McLaren Vale Shiraz and Zinfandel differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Zinfandel has more sweetness; McLaren Vale Shiraz has more tannin; McLaren Vale Shiraz has more body.

Choose

McLaren Vale Shiraz

Choose McLaren Vale Shiraz if you want something more tannic and structured, fuller and richer, more savoury.

Choose

Zinfandel

Choose Zinfandel if you want something sweeter, spicier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

McLaren Vale Shirazlow (1/5)
Zinfandeltypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Zinfandel is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Zinfandeltypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is more savoury: medium against low-medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Zinfandel is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is rounder and creamier in texture: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Acidity: Similar — both medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both high.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionMcLaren Vale ShirazZinfandel
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, red plum, dark chocolate, sea salt, liquoriceblackberry, raspberry jam, black pepper, cinnamon, raisin

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more