Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Mencía vs Xinomavro

How Mencía and Xinomavro differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Xinomavro has more savoury character; Xinomavro has more tannin; Mencía has more herbal / green character.

Choose

Mencía

Choose Mencía if you want something more herbal and green, fruitier.

Choose

Xinomavro

Choose Xinomavro if you want something more savoury, more tannic and structured, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Mencíalow-medium (2/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is more savoury: high against low-medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Mencíatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is more tannic and structured: high against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Mencíatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Xinomavrolow (1/5)

Mencía is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Mencíatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Mencíatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Mencía is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Mencíatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)

Xinomavro is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionMencíaXinomavro
Savoury characterlow-medium (2/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, raspberry, violet, graphite, bay leafsun-dried tomato, olive, red cherry, dried herbs, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more