Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo vs Rosso di Montalcino

How Montepulciano d’Abruzzo and Rosso di Montalcino differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo and Rosso di Montalcino come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Rosso di Montalcino has more acidity; Rosso di Montalcino has more herbal / green character; Rosso di Montalcino has more perceived freshness.

Choose

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

Choose Montepulciano d’Abruzzo if you want something rounder and creamier in texture.

Choose

Rosso di Montalcino

Choose Rosso di Montalcino if you want something fresher and more acidic, more herbal and green, fresher.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fresher: high against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionMontepulciano d’AbruzzoRosso di Montalcino
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoared cherry, plum, dried herbs, violet, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more