Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Montepulciano vs Nerello Mascalese

How Montepulciano and Nerello Mascalese differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Montepulciano and Nerello Mascalese come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Nerello Mascalese has more earthy character; Nerello Mascalese has more acidity; Nerello Mascalese has more floral character.

Choose

Montepulciano

Choose Montepulciano if you want something fuller and richer.

Choose

Nerello Mascalese

Choose Nerello Mascalese if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, more floral.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Montepulcianolow (1/5)
Nerello Mascalesetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Nerello Mascalese is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nerello Mascalesetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Nerello Mascalese is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Montepulcianolow (1/5)
Nerello Mascalesetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Nerello Mascalese is more floral: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Nerello Mascalesetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Nerello Mascalese is fresher: high against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nerello Mascalesetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Nerello Mascalese is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Nerello Mascalesetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Montepulciano is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both low-medium.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionMontepulcianoNerello Mascalese
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C14–16°C
Typical flavoursblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoared cherry, dried orange peel, ash, wild herbs, smoke

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more