Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Morgon vs Rosso di Montalcino

How Morgon and Rosso di Montalcino differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Rosso di Montalcino has more herbal / green character; Morgon has more earthy character; Rosso di Montalcino has more acidity.

Choose

Morgon

Choose Morgon if you want something earthier, more aromatic.

Choose

Rosso di Montalcino

Choose Rosso di Montalcino if you want something more herbal and green, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Morgonlow (1/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Morgontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)

Morgon is earthier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Morgontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Morgontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Morgontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Rosso di Montalcinomedium (3/5)

Morgon is more aromatic: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Morgontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both low-medium.

Full side by side

DimensionMorgonRosso di Montalcino
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, kirsch, violet, earth, dried herbsred cherry, plum, dried herbs, violet, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more