Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Nero d’Avola vs Shiraz

How Nero d’Avola and Shiraz differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Nero d’Avola has more acidity; Shiraz has more tannin; Shiraz has more alcohol.

Choose

Nero d’Avola

Choose Nero d’Avola if you want something fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Shiraz

Choose Shiraz if you want something more tannic and structured, stronger and warmer, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Nero d’Avolatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Nero d’Avola is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Nero d’Avolatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Shiraztypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Shiraz is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Nero d’Avolatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Shiraz is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Nero d’Avolatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Shiraz is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Nero d’Avolatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Shiraz is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Nero d’Avolatypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Shiraztypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Shiraz is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionNero d’AvolaShiraz
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnessmedium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, plum, liquorice, tobacco, dried herbsblackberry, plum, dark chocolate, licorice, vanilla

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more