Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Nero d’Avola vs Xinomavro

How Nero d’Avola and Xinomavro differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Xinomavro has more earthy character; Xinomavro has more tannin; Xinomavro has more savoury character.

Choose

Nero d’Avola

Choose Nero d’Avola if you want something spicier.

Choose

Xinomavro

Choose Xinomavro if you want something earthier, more tannic and structured, more savoury.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Nero d’Avolalow (1/5)
Xinomavrotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Xinomavro is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Nero d’Avolatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is more tannic and structured: high against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Nero d’Avolatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is more savoury: high against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Nero d’Avolalow (1/5)
Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Xinomavro is more floral: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Nero d’Avolatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Xinomavrolow (1/5)

Nero d’Avola is spicier: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Nero d’Avolamedium (3/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is fresher: high against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionNero d’AvolaXinomavro
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnessmedium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, plum, liquorice, tobacco, dried herbssun-dried tomato, olive, red cherry, dried herbs, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more