Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Northern Rhône Syrah vs Washington Cabernet Sauvignon

How Northern Rhône Syrah and Washington Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Northern Rhône Syrah and Washington Cabernet Sauvignon are both made from Syrah, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Northern Rhône Syrah has more earthy character; Northern Rhône Syrah has more savoury character; Northern Rhône Syrah has more floral character.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Northern Rhône Syrah

Choose Northern Rhône Syrah if you want something earthier, more savoury, more floral.

Choose

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Washington Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something fuller and richer, fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Northern Rhône Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Northern Rhône Syrah is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Northern Rhône Syrahtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Northern Rhône Syrah is more savoury: high against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Northern Rhône Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Northern Rhône Syrah is more floral: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Northern Rhône Syrahtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Northern Rhône Syrah is spicier: high against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Northern Rhône Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Northern Rhône Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionNorthern Rhône SyrahWashington Cabernet Sauvignon
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, black pepper, green olive, bacon, violetblackcurrant, black cherry, cocoa, graphite, sage

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more