Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Hawke’s Bay Syrah vs Rosso di Montalcino

How Hawke’s Bay Syrah and Rosso di Montalcino differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Hawke’s Bay Syrah has more spice; Hawke’s Bay Syrah has more floral character; Rosso di Montalcino has more herbal / green character.

Choose

Hawke’s Bay Syrah

Choose Hawke’s Bay Syrah if you want something spicier, more floral, more oaky.

Choose

Rosso di Montalcino

Choose Rosso di Montalcino if you want something more herbal and green, fresher and more acidic, fresher.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is spicier: high against low.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahlow (1/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fresher: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionHawke’s Bay SyrahRosso di Montalcino
Spicetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)low (1/5)
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, black pepper, violet, olive, plumred cherry, plum, dried herbs, violet, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more