Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Pinotage vs Washington Cabernet Sauvignon

How Pinotage and Washington Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Pinotage has more earthy character; Pinotage has more sweetness; Washington Cabernet Sauvignon has more body.

Choose

Pinotage

Choose Pinotage if you want something earthier, sweeter, more oaky.

Choose

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Washington Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something fuller and richer, fruitier, fresher.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Pinotage is earthier: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Pinotagetypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Pinotage is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Pinotage is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionPinotageWashington Cabernet Sauvignon
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursbramble, plum, smoke, coffee, dark chocolateblackcurrant, black cherry, cocoa, graphite, sage

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more