Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Pinotage vs Syrah

Pinotage has a divisive reputation, and a comparison to a variety people know is the most useful way to say what it actually tastes like.

The short answer

The main differences: Pinotage has more acidity; Syrah has more aromatic intensity; Pinotage has more oak influence.

Choose

Pinotage

Choose Pinotage if you want something fresher and more acidic, more oaky.

Choose

Syrah

Choose Syrah if you want something more aromatic, more savoury, more floral.

Worth knowing

Serious Pinotage from Stellenbosch and Swartland is dark, smoky and savoury, and the comparison to Syrah holds reasonably well. The commercial coffee-and-chocolate style is a different wine made with heavily toasted staves, and most of Pinotage’s reputation — good and bad — depends on which of the two is being discussed.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Pinotage is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Pinotagemedium (3/5)
Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Syrah is more aromatic: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)

Pinotage is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)

Syrah is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Pinotagelow (1/5)
Syrahtypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Syrah is more floral: low-medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Syrah is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionPinotageSyrah
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnessmedium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursbramble, plum, smoke, coffee, dark chocolateblackberry, black pepper, olive, cured meat, violet

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more