Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Rosso di Montalcino vs Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir

How Rosso di Montalcino and Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir has more earthy character; Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir has more floral character; Rosso di Montalcino has more herbal / green character.

Choose

Rosso di Montalcino

Choose Rosso di Montalcino if you want something more herbal and green, more tannic and structured, fuller and richer.

Choose

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir

Choose Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir if you want something earthier, more floral, more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is more floral: medium against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirlow (1/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionRosso di MontalcinoSonoma Coast Pinot Noir
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at15–17°C14–16°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, plum, dried herbs, violet, leatherred cherry, cranberry, forest floor, blood orange, sea spray

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more