Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Rosso di Montalcino vs Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends

How Rosso di Montalcino and Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends has more spice; Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends has more earthy character; Rosso di Montalcino has more acidity.

Choose

Rosso di Montalcino

Choose Rosso di Montalcino if you want something fresher and more acidic, fresher.

Choose

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends

Choose Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends if you want something spicier, earthier, more herbal and green.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is more herbal and green: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fresher: high against medium-plus.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionRosso di MontalcinoSwartland Syrah and Rhône blends
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, plum, dried herbs, violet, leatherblackberry, white pepper, fynbos, olive, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more