Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Rosso di Montalcino vs Southern Rhône blend

How Rosso di Montalcino and Southern Rhône blend differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Southern Rhône blend has more spice; Rosso di Montalcino has more acidity; Southern Rhône blend has more earthy character.

Choose

Rosso di Montalcino

Choose Rosso di Montalcino if you want something fresher and more acidic, fresher, more tannic and structured.

Choose

Southern Rhône blend

Choose Southern Rhône blend if you want something spicier, earthier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Southern Rhône blend is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Southern Rhône blend is earthier: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fresher: high against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionRosso di MontalcinoSouthern Rhône blend
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, plum, dried herbs, violet, leatherred plum, strawberry, dried herbs, black pepper, liquorice

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more