Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Rosso di Montalcino vs Vino Nobile di Montepulciano

How Rosso di Montalcino and Vino Nobile di Montepulciano differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Rosso di Montalcino and Vino Nobile di Montepulciano are both made from Sangiovese, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Rosso di Montalcino has more herbal / green character; Vino Nobile di Montepulciano has more earthy character; Rosso di Montalcino has more fruit intensity.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Rosso di Montalcino

Choose Rosso di Montalcino if you want something more herbal and green, fruitier, fresher.

Choose

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano

Choose Vino Nobile di Montepulciano if you want something earthier, more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianolow (1/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is earthier: medium against low.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fresher: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionRosso di MontalcinoVino Nobile di Montepulciano
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, plum, dried herbs, violet, leathersour cherry, plum, dried herbs, leather, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more