Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Saperavi vs Washington Cabernet Sauvignon

How Saperavi and Washington Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Saperavi has more earthy character; Saperavi has more sweetness; Saperavi has more acidity.

Choose

Saperavi

Choose Saperavi if you want something earthier, sweeter, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Washington Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something fuller and richer, fruitier, more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Saperavitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Saperavi is earthier: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Saperavitypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Saperavi is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Saperavitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Saperavi is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Saperavitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Saperavitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Saperavitypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionSaperaviWashington Cabernet Sauvignon
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdamson, sour plum, blackcurrant, liquorice, tobaccoblackcurrant, black cherry, cocoa, graphite, sage

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more