Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Southern Rhône blend vs Valpolicella Ripasso

How Southern Rhône blend and Valpolicella Ripasso differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Southern Rhône blend has more herbal / green character; Southern Rhône blend has more earthy character; Valpolicella Ripasso has more sweetness.

Choose

Southern Rhône blend

Choose Southern Rhône blend if you want something more herbal and green, earthier, spicier.

Choose

Valpolicella Ripasso

Choose Valpolicella Ripasso if you want something sweeter, fresher and more acidic, fresher.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Valpolicella Ripassolow (1/5)

Southern Rhône blend is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Valpolicella Ripassolow (1/5)

Southern Rhône blend is earthier: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Southern Rhône blendlow (1/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Southern Rhône blend is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionSouthern Rhône blendValpolicella Ripasso
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursred plum, strawberry, dried herbs, black pepper, liquoricesour cherry, dried fig, cinnamon, plum, bitter chocolate

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more