Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Valpolicella Ripasso vs Vino Nobile di Montepulciano

How Valpolicella Ripasso and Vino Nobile di Montepulciano differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Valpolicella Ripasso and Vino Nobile di Montepulciano come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Valpolicella Ripasso has more spice; Vino Nobile di Montepulciano has more earthy character; Valpolicella Ripasso has more sweetness.

Choose

Valpolicella Ripasso

Choose Valpolicella Ripasso if you want something spicier, sweeter, fruitier.

Choose

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano

Choose Vino Nobile di Montepulciano if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianolow (1/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is spicier: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Valpolicella Ripassolow (1/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is earthier: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Valpolicella Ripassotypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianolow (1/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionValpolicella RipassoVino Nobile di Montepulciano
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, dried fig, cinnamon, plum, bitter chocolatesour cherry, plum, dried herbs, leather, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more