Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Valpolicella Ripasso vs Naoussa Xinomavro

How Valpolicella Ripasso and Naoussa Xinomavro differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Naoussa Xinomavro has more earthy character; Naoussa Xinomavro has more tannin; Naoussa Xinomavro has more savoury character.

Choose

Valpolicella Ripasso

Choose Valpolicella Ripasso if you want something spicier, sweeter.

Choose

Naoussa Xinomavro

Choose Naoussa Xinomavro if you want something earthier, more tannic and structured, more savoury.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Valpolicella Ripassolow (1/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more tannic and structured: high against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more savoury: high against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Valpolicella Ripassolow (1/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more floral: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrolow (1/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is spicier: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Valpolicella Ripassotypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrolow (1/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionValpolicella RipassoNaoussa Xinomavro
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low (1/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, dried fig, cinnamon, plum, bitter chocolatesun-dried tomato, olive, red cherry, dried herbs, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more