Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Learn

Why we clink glasses

The poisoning story is almost certainly false. What the custom actually seems to be about is more interesting, and better evidenced.

Overview

The story everybody knows is that clinking glasses caused wine to slosh between them, proving neither was poisoned. It is repeated constantly and there is essentially no historical evidence for it. It also does not survive a moment’s thought: anyone willing to poison a guest would simply decline to clink.

The likelier explanation is duller and better supported. Drinking is the one sense-engaging act that leaves hearing unoccupied — you see the wine, smell it, taste it and feel it, and the clink completes the set. The custom of making a noise together also does what most table rituals do: it marks a shared moment and synchronises a group.

Toasting itself has a documented history in classical Greece and Rome, where libations were poured and healths drunk, and the English word "toast" comes from the practice of putting spiced bread in the cup.

None of which means the poisoning story is worth suppressing. It is worth labelling: a good story, widely repeated, with nothing behind it.

Where the story and the evidence part company

The poison origin is folk etymology of the same family as most "this custom began because…" explanations. WineHQ records it as unevidenced rather than repeating it, and does not assert the alternative explanation as fact either — it is a reasonable account rather than a documented one.

Sources

Sources consulted

  • The Oxford Companion to WineOxford University Press

More in learn