Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Amarone della Valpolicella vs Washington Cabernet Sauvignon

How Amarone della Valpolicella and Washington Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Amarone della Valpolicella has more sweetness; Amarone della Valpolicella has more alcohol; Amarone della Valpolicella has more savoury character.

Choose

Amarone della Valpolicella

Choose Amarone della Valpolicella if you want something sweeter, stronger and warmer, more savoury.

Choose

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Washington Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something fresher.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is rounder and creamier in texture: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both high.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionAmarone della ValpolicellaWashington Cabernet Sauvignon
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdried cherry, fig, raisin, bitter chocolate, cinnamonblackcurrant, black cherry, cocoa, graphite, sage

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more