Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cru Beaujolais vs Rosso di Montalcino

How Cru Beaujolais and Rosso di Montalcino differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cru Beaujolais has more floral character; Rosso di Montalcino has more herbal / green character; Cru Beaujolais has more earthy character.

Choose

Cru Beaujolais

Choose Cru Beaujolais if you want something more floral, earthier.

Choose

Rosso di Montalcino

Choose Rosso di Montalcino if you want something more herbal and green, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)

Cru Beaujolais is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Cru Beaujolaislow (1/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)

Cru Beaujolais is earthier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both low-medium.
  • Spice: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionCru BeaujolaisRosso di Montalcino
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursdark cherry, violet, granite, raspberry, irisred cherry, plum, dried herbs, violet, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more