Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Blaufränkisch vs Cabernet Franc

How Blaufränkisch and Cabernet Franc differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cabernet Franc has more herbal / green character; Blaufränkisch has more spice; Cabernet Franc has more floral character.

Choose

Blaufränkisch

Choose Blaufränkisch if you want something spicier, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Choose

Cabernet Franc

Choose Cabernet Franc if you want something more herbal and green, more floral.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Blaufränkischlow (1/5)
Cabernet Franctypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)

Cabernet Franc is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Cabernet Franclow (1/5)

Blaufränkisch is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Blaufränkischlow (1/5)
Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cabernet Franc is more floral: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Blaufränkischtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Cabernet Franctypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Blaufränkisch is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Blaufränkisch is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Blaufränkisch is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Body: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.
  • Earthy character: Similar — both medium.
  • Perceived freshness: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionBlaufränkischCabernet Franc
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C14–16°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, blackberry, black pepper, graphite, violetraspberry, red plum, graphite, bell pepper, violet

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more