Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Blaufränkisch vs Nebbiolo

How Blaufränkisch and Nebbiolo differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Nebbiolo has more floral character; Nebbiolo has more aromatic intensity; Nebbiolo has more tannin.

Choose

Blaufränkisch

Choose Blaufränkisch if you want something fruitier.

Choose

Nebbiolo

Choose Nebbiolo if you want something more floral, more aromatic, more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Blaufränkischlow (1/5)
Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Nebbiolo is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Blaufränkischmedium (3/5)
Nebbiolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Nebbiolo is more aromatic: high against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Nebbiolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Nebbiolo is more tannic and structured: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Blaufränkischtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Nebbiolo is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Nebbiolotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Blaufränkisch is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Blaufränkischtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Nebbiolo is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionBlaufränkischNebbiolo
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C16–18°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, blackberry, black pepper, graphite, violetsour cherry, rose, tar, dried herbs, truffle

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more