Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Brunello di Montalcino vs Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon

How Brunello di Montalcino and Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Brunello di Montalcino has more earthy character; Brunello di Montalcino has more savoury character; Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon has more herbal / green character.

Choose

Brunello di Montalcino

Choose Brunello di Montalcino if you want something earthier, more savoury, spicier.

Choose

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Brunello di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Brunello di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is more savoury: high against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Brunello di Montalcinolow (1/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Brunello di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Brunello di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Brunello di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is more tannic and structured: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBrunello di MontalcinoCoonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, leather, dried herbs, tobacco, espressocassis, mint, eucalyptus, blackcurrant leaf, cedar

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more