Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Brunello di Montalcino vs Taurasi

How Brunello di Montalcino and Taurasi differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Brunello di Montalcino and Taurasi come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Brunello di Montalcino has more fruit intensity; Brunello di Montalcino has more texture.

Choose

Brunello di Montalcino

Choose Brunello di Montalcino if you want something fruitier, rounder and creamier in texture.

Choose

Taurasi

Choose Taurasi if you prefer its flavour profile — black cherry, plum, leather.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Brunello di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Taurasitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Brunello di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Taurasitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Tannin: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionBrunello di MontalcinoTaurasi
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, leather, dried herbs, tobacco, espressoblack cherry, plum, leather, ash, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more