Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cabernet Franc vs Nebbiolo

How Cabernet Franc and Nebbiolo differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cabernet Franc has more herbal / green character; Nebbiolo has more tannin; Nebbiolo has more spice.

Choose

Cabernet Franc

Choose Cabernet Franc if you want something more herbal and green.

Choose

Nebbiolo

Choose Nebbiolo if you want something more tannic and structured, spicier, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Cabernet Franctypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Nebbiololow (1/5)

Cabernet Franc is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nebbiolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Nebbiolo is more tannic and structured: high against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Cabernet Franclow (1/5)
Nebbiolotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Nebbiolo is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Cabernet Franctypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Nebbiolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Nebbiolo is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Nebbiolo is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Nebbiolo is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Perceived freshness: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.
  • Texture: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionCabernet FrancNebbiolo
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursraspberry, red plum, graphite, bell pepper, violetsour cherry, rose, tar, dried herbs, truffle

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more