Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cabernet Franc vs Nerello Mascalese

How Cabernet Franc and Nerello Mascalese differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cabernet Franc has more herbal / green character; Nerello Mascalese has more acidity; Nerello Mascalese has more tannin.

Choose

Cabernet Franc

Choose Cabernet Franc if you want something more herbal and green, more aromatic.

Choose

Nerello Mascalese

Choose Nerello Mascalese if you want something fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured, stronger and warmer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Cabernet Franctypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Nerello Mascaleselow (1/5)

Cabernet Franc is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Cabernet Franctypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Nerello Mascalesetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Nerello Mascalese is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nerello Mascalesetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Nerello Mascalese is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nerello Mascalesetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Nerello Mascalese is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Cabernet Franctypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Nerello Mascalesemedium (3/5)

Cabernet Franc is more aromatic: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nerello Mascalesetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Nerello Mascalese is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Body: Similar — both medium.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both low-medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionCabernet FrancNerello Mascalese
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C14–16°C
Typical flavoursraspberry, red plum, graphite, bell pepper, violetred cherry, dried orange peel, ash, wild herbs, smoke

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more