Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cabernet Franc vs Xinomavro

How Cabernet Franc and Xinomavro differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cabernet Franc has more herbal / green character; Xinomavro has more tannin; Xinomavro has more savoury character.

Choose

Cabernet Franc

Choose Cabernet Franc if you want something more herbal and green, more aromatic.

Choose

Xinomavro

Choose Xinomavro if you want something more tannic and structured, more savoury, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Cabernet Franctypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Xinomavrolow (1/5)

Cabernet Franc is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is more tannic and structured: high against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is more savoury: high against medium.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Cabernet Franctypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Xinomavrotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Xinomavro is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Cabernet Franctypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Xinomavromedium (3/5)

Cabernet Franc is more aromatic: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Body: Similar — both medium.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both medium.
  • Spice: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionCabernet FrancXinomavro
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursraspberry, red plum, graphite, bell pepper, violetsun-dried tomato, olive, red cherry, dried herbs, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more