Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Nebbiolo vs Nerello Mascalese

How Nebbiolo and Nerello Mascalese differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Nebbiolo and Nerello Mascalese come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Nebbiolo has more aromatic intensity; Nebbiolo has more spice; Nebbiolo has more tannin.

Choose

Nebbiolo

Choose Nebbiolo if you want something more aromatic, spicier, more tannic and structured.

Choose

Nerello Mascalese

Choose Nerello Mascalese if you prefer its flavour profile — red cherry, dried orange peel, ash.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Nebbiolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Nerello Mascalesemedium (3/5)

Nebbiolo is more aromatic: high against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Nebbiolotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nerello Mascaleselow (1/5)

Nebbiolo is spicier: medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Nebbiolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Nerello Mascalesetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Nebbiolo is more tannic and structured: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Nerello Mascalesetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Nebbiolo is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Nebbiolotypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Nerello Mascalesetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Nebbiolo is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Nerello Mascalesetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Nebbiolo is more floral: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionNebbioloNerello Mascalese
Aromatic intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)medium (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at16–18°C14–16°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, rose, tar, dried herbs, trufflered cherry, dried orange peel, ash, wild herbs, smoke

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more