Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Pinotage vs Tannat

How Pinotage and Tannat differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Pinotage has more spice; Tannat has more tannin; Tannat has more body.

Choose

Pinotage

Choose Pinotage if you want something spicier, more oaky, rounder and creamier in texture.

Choose

Tannat

Choose Tannat if you want something more tannic and structured, fuller and richer, more savoury.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannatlow (1/5)

Pinotage is spicier: medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannattypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Tannat is more tannic and structured: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tannattypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Tannat is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Tannattypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Pinotage is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Tannat is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannattypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Pinotage is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionPinotageTannat
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnessmedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursbramble, plum, smoke, coffee, dark chocolateblackberry, plum, smoke, licorice, dark chocolate

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more