Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Rosso di Montalcino vs Valpolicella Ripasso

How Rosso di Montalcino and Valpolicella Ripasso differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Rosso di Montalcino and Valpolicella Ripasso come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Rosso di Montalcino has more herbal / green character; Valpolicella Ripasso has more spice; Valpolicella Ripasso has more sweetness.

Choose

Rosso di Montalcino

Choose Rosso di Montalcino if you want something more herbal and green, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Choose

Valpolicella Ripasso

Choose Valpolicella Ripasso if you want something spicier, sweeter.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Valpolicella Ripassolow (1/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is spicier: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Rosso di Montalcinolow (1/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Rosso di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rosso di Montalcino is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both low-medium.

Full side by side

DimensionRosso di MontalcinoValpolicella Ripasso
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, plum, dried herbs, violet, leathersour cherry, dried fig, cinnamon, plum, bitter chocolate

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more