Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Tannat vs Xinomavro

How Tannat and Xinomavro differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Tannat has more body; Xinomavro has more floral character; Xinomavro has more perceived freshness.

Choose

Tannat

Choose Tannat if you want something fuller and richer, fruitier.

Choose

Xinomavro

Choose Xinomavro if you want something more floral, fresher, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Tannattypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Tannat is fuller and richer: high against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Tannatlow (1/5)
Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Xinomavro is more floral: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Tannatmedium (3/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is fresher: high against medium.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Tannat is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is more savoury: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionTannatXinomavro
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnessmedium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, plum, smoke, licorice, dark chocolatesun-dried tomato, olive, red cherry, dried herbs, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more