Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Beaujolais vs Valpolicella

How Beaujolais and Valpolicella differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Beaujolais has more floral character; Valpolicella has more acidity; Valpolicella has more savoury character.

Choose

Beaujolais

Choose Beaujolais if you want something more floral.

Choose

Valpolicella

Choose Valpolicella if you want something fresher and more acidic, more savoury.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Valpolicellalow (1/5)

Beaujolais is more floral: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Valpolicella is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Beaujolaislow-medium (2/5)
Valpolicellatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Valpolicella is more savoury: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both low-medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium.
  • Body: Similar — both low-medium.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionBeaujolaisValpolicella
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury characterlow-medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Bodytypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Serve at12–14°C13–15°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, raspberry, banana, bubblegum, violetsour cherry, red plum, almond, violet, herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more